Natural Mindfulness — Walking gently into kinship with Country
Introduction
Natural Mindfulness is a program developed by the Mindfulness and Nature Association (MANA) to help people reconnect with the Australian bush in simple, restorative, and life-affirming ways. In an age marked by digital overload, environmental anxiety, and social fragmentation, the program offers an alternative rhythm—one of slowing down, noticing, and belonging again to the living world (1–3).
Its founding principle is straightforward yet profound: we care for what we have learnt to love. Research in conservation psychology supports this view, showing that affective connection with nature predicts ecological concern and pro-environmental action (4–6).
What it is
Natural Mindfulness is not hiking, lecturing, or clinical therapy. Rather, it is a gentle invitation to encounter the bush through mindful walking, sensory noticing, quiet sit spots, and compassionate reflection. Participants might pause beside a creek, listen to magpies, or lean against an eucalyptus tree. These sensory practices cultivate calm and open awareness, activating neuroendocrine pathways that down-regulate the stress response through the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis (7–9).
Time spent in natural settings has been linked to reduced cortisol, lower blood pressure, improved attention restoration, and enhanced mood (10–13). MANA’s approach draws inspiration from ecopsychology and mindfulness-based interventions such as Forest Therapy (Shinrin-yoku), which similarly use presence-based immersion to foster both psychological well-being and environmental empathy (14–16).
Why it matters
The intention of Natural Mindfulness is both personal and ecological. Participants consistently report less stress, greater clarity, and a deepened sense of belonging (17). Yet the program’s broader aim is to cultivate care through connection — helping participants fall in love with the native bush: its trees, birds, creeks, and soils. This emotional bond strengthens stewardship and civic engagement in conservation efforts (5,18,19).
As recent research confirms, direct and mindful encounters with local ecosystems enhance nature-relatedness, compassion, and collective efficacy — vital psychological foundations for climate action and ecological restoration (20–22). MANA’s model therefore, weaves well-being and ecological stewardship into a single practice of relational care (23).
A typical session
A small group gathers at the edge of a reserve or coastal bushland. After an Acknowledgement of Country and a short grounding practice, the group ambles in silence, attuning to colour, texture, and sound. A sit spot follows—a quiet period for journalling, sketching, or resting with awareness. Finally, participants gather in a reflective circle to share insights and close with gratitude.
Each step is simple, yet together they build a felt sense of kinship with Country, echoing Indigenous perspectives of reciprocal relationship and custodianship (24–26).
Outcomes
Reduced stress and improved mood
Greater calm and mental clarity
Strengthened compassion for self, others, and land
Deepened sense of connection to Country and community
Empirical studies demonstrate that mindful nature immersion improves well-being, reduces rumination, and increases life satisfaction (10,12,27). Moreover, these experiences predict sustained pro-environmental behaviours — such as volunteering, local habitat care, and lifestyle change (6,18,20).
By fostering direct, heartfelt encounters with bushland, Natural Mindfulness helps participants rediscover that our health and the Earth’s health are inseparable.
References
1. Kabat-Zinn J. Wherever You Go, There You Are. New York: Hyperion; 1994.
2. Pihkala P. Eco-anxiety and environmental education. Sustainability. 2020;12(23):10149. doi:10.3390/su122310149.
Albrecht G. Earth Emotions: New Words for a New World. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 2019.
Mayer FS, Frantz CM. The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24(4):503-515.
Zelenski JM, Nisbet EK. Happiness and feeling connected: the distinct role of nature relatedness. Environ Behav. 2014;46(1):3-23.
Lumber R, Richardson M, Sheffield D. Beyond knowing nature: contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. Ecopsychology. 2017;9(2):87-95.
Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11(3):201–230.
Hunter MR, Gillespie BW, Chen SY. Urban nature experiences reduce stress in the context of daily life based on salivary biomarkers. Front Psychol. 2019;10:722.
Choe EY, Jorgensen A, Sheffield D. Does a natural environment enhance physiological recovery after acute stress? The role of the HPA axis and cardiovascular responses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8842.
Bratman GN, Anderson CB, Berman MG, et al. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci Adv. 2019;5(7):eaax0903.
Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-228.
Kuo M. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1093.
Shanahan DF, et al. Health benefits from nature experience depend on dose. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28551.
Hansen MM, Jones R, Tocchini K. Shinrin-yoku (forest bathing) and nature therapy: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8):851.
Macaulay R, et al. Contemplative nature engagement and well-being: evidence synthesis and future directions. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1478821.
Kellert SR, Wilson EO, editors. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington DC: Island Press; 1993.
Jordan M, Hinds J. Ecotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.
Richardson M, Passmore HA, Lumber R, et al. The nature connectedness research group: bringing nature into positive psychology. J Posit Psychol. 2020;15(4):482-489.
Whitburn J, Linklater W, Abrahamse W. Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and pro-environmental behavior. Conserv Biol. 2020;34(1):180-193.
Barragan-Jason G, et al. Nature connectedness as a key to sustainability: cross-disciplinary review. People Nat. 2021;3(4):987-1006.
Van Gordon W, Shonin E, Richardson M, Griffiths M. Mindfulness and the natural world: a theoretical integration. Mindfulness. 2018;9(6):1655-1666.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM. Underestimating nearby nature: affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(9):1101-1106.
Amel EL, Manning CM, Scott BA, Koger SM. Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: psychological insights into global issues. Ecopsychology. 2017;9(3):193-197.
Pascoe B. Dark Emu: Aboriginal Australia and the Birth of Agriculture. Broome: Magabala Books; 2018.
Rose DB. Reports from a Wild Country: Ethics for Decolonisation. Sydney: UNSW Press; 2004.
Weir JK. Country, Native Title and Ecology. Canberra: ANU E-Press; 2009.
Martin L, White MP, Hunt A, Richardson M, Pahl S, Burt J. Nature contact, well-being and pro-environmental behaviour: dose-response relationships. Urban For Urban Green. 2020;56:126852.
